Droopy Knows Best - His Appearance Reflects That Attitude
GOP Redneck goobers always project a strong attitude about
too much government, right????
Call this a Rick Perry “Oops” moment - story from here.
$200 Fine or 30 Days
in Jail for Sagging Pants?
A
From the ACLU to the Opelousas, LA
City Council:
From news reports on KATC.com, the ACLU of Louisiana has
learned that the City of Opelousas
plans to consider an ordinance to regulate the attire of people in Opelousas .
We understand that the ordinance will be based on one in Ville Platte, and
based on the text of that ordinance, we urge you to not to support that
proposal, which is a violation of the Constitutional rights of the people of
Opelousas.
As we understand it, the ordinance to be proposed will
provide that “Pants worn by any person, regardless of age, should be size
appropriate and secured at the waist to prevent the pants from falling more
than three inches below the hips (crest of the ilium).” The penalties
would include fines and community service, if they are consistent with those currently
in place in Ville Platte.
This letter is to advise you that clothing is a form of
expression protected under the Constitution of the United
States . To ban a particular clothing style
would violate a liberty interest guaranteed under the 14th Amendment of the US
Constitution. In Kelley v. Johnson, 425 U.S.
238, 244 (1976), the US Supreme Court assumed without deciding that individuals
have a liberty interest in their personal appearance. This has been
affirmed by the US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal, among others, Lansdale
v. Tyler Junior College, 470 F.2d 659, 663 (5th Cir. 1972) (en banc), cert. denied,
411 U.S. 986 (1973) .
The government must demonstrate a rational basis for its ban
– and Opelousas has no legitimate rational
basis for regulating the attire of its residents.
No comments:
Post a Comment