“Bipartisan deal on border and Ukraine
at risk of collapse as Trump presses Senate Republicans to walk away”
WASHINGTON — A bi-partisan Senate deal to pair
border-enforcement measures and Ukraine aid face potential collapse as Senate
Republicans grew increasingly wary of an election-year compromise that Trump,
the GOP likely Republican presidential nominee, is pressing congressional
allies to abandon.
Senate negotiators have
been striving for weeks to finish a carefully negotiated
compromise on border and immigration policy that is meant to tamp down the
number of migrants who come into the U.S. from Mexico.
Now the negotiations have
dragged for weeks and with election-year political demands from Trump weighing it down.
At stake is a plan that both President Joe
Biden and Senate GOP Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) have worked on
for months to broker in hopes of cajoling Congress to approve wartime aid for
Ukraine.
Fact: The U.S. has run out of money to supply
Ukraine, potentially leaving the country stranded without robust supplies of
ammunition and missiles to fend off Russia’s unprovoked full-scale
invasion as its second anniversary nears.
Trump ramped up his criticism of the potential compromise, writing in two lengthy posts on his social-media platform that it would be “meaningless in terms of border security” and “would be another Gift to the Radical Left Democrats” as Biden seeks re-election.
Trump said the Senate is better off not making
a deal, even if it means the country will “close
up” (shut down) while not proposing any options, just simply blame to hurt Biden.
Sen. Mitt Romney
(R-UT) says: “I think that the border
is a very important issue for Donald Trump, and the fact that he would
communicate to Republican senators and congress people that he doesn’t want us
to solve the border problem, because he wants to blame Biden for it, is really
appalling.”
In a closed-door Republican meeting, McConnell acknowledged
the reality of Trump’s opposition and that Trump is the party’s likely
presidential nominee – all the while he discussed other options, including
separating Ukraine and the border (according
to two people familiar with the meeting who spoke anonymously).
Punchbowl News first reported the remarks, describing McConnell as
acknowledging he faces a quandary. McConnell’s comments raised fresh doubts in
the Senate about his level of commitment to the border deal, though advocates
for moving forward countered that the leader’s remarks were being
misinterpreted when he told reporters: “We’re
still working on it.”
He also reassured the conference at a Republican luncheon that
he still personally supports pairing the border and Ukraine; that according to Sen.
Mike Rounds (R-SD).
Sen. James Lankford
(R-OK), the GOP head negotiator, said the group is still working on the
package. He said McConnell was advocating for the proposal while simply
acknowledging the political reality that the presidential primary season is
fully underway, saying: “I think
that’s the shift that has occurred, that he’s just acknowledging. That’s just a
reality.”
Lankford has been working with a small bipartisan group and
White House officials in an effort to close out the border deal. But release of
the legislation has been held up by haggling over the price of the new policies
and continued disagreements over limiting the president’s ability to
allow people into the country under special circumstances, such as fleeing war
and unrest.
Sen. Kyrsten Sinema
(I-AZ) has been central to the talks said: “We’re
really focused on making sure we get the bill out and that we get it through
the Senate.”
White House
spokeswoman Olivia Dalton told reporters aboard Air Force One: “The Biden administration has been working
with the negotiators in good faith and he feels that progress has been made,
and hopes it will continue.”
Sen. John Thune
(R-SD), second-ranking Senate Republican said: “We are at a critical
moment, and we’ve got to drive hard to get this done. If we can’t get there,
then we’ll go to Plan B.”
Sen. Chuck Schumer
(D-NY), DEM Majority Leader said: “We
know that if Putin prevails in Ukraine, the consequences for Western democracy
and for the American people will be severe, and haunt us for years. We know that if Putin prevails in Ukraine,
the consequences for Western democracy and for the American people will be severe,
and haunt us for years. Democrats are also resolute on reaching an agreement on
securing the southern border.”
But congressional leaders
have not identified any other way to push wartime funding for Ukraine through
the darkening political prospects of the cause.
Plus, scores of House Republicans are unwilling to send more
money to Ukraine even as longtime party stalwarts, such as McConnell, have
tried to convince them that preventing Russian President Vladimir Putin’s
advance in Europe is directly in America’s interest and that the cost to the
U.S. of providing military aid is a bargain given its capacity to degrade the
Russian military and deter further territorial ambitions.
Related to the House stance is this from Speaker “MAGA” Mike
Johnson (R-LA) now firmly lip-locked on Trump as seen in this article from ROLL CALL with this headline [click link for the full story].
Advocates of sustained Ukraine
aid say that much of Washington’s expenditures go to U.S. defense
contractors and thereby supports domestic jobs and GDP.
Trump has loomed large over the talks, first skewering
American support for Ukraine and now potentially upending any compromise.
That is true especially on the border part that he believe would
hand President Joe Biden new policies meant to contain the historic numbers of
migrants making their way to the country. With Republicans continuously raise
the issue on the campaign trail, the border will likely remain central to
elections this year.
Although many in Congress are anxiously
awaiting the bill text, Trump has already said on social media that there
should be no bipartisan border deal “unless we get EVERYTHING needed to shut
down the INVASION of Millions & Millions of people.”
The lead Democratic
negotiator, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) said he still has hope that Republicans will
decide to accept the compromise — even though Democrats didn’t want to tie
Ukraine aid and border security together in the first place, adding: “A lot of Republicans have become used to
this being just merely a political issue, not an actual policy problem. And
that’s hard for them to get over. But there is a big group of Senate
Republicans who do want to solve the problem.”
Seeking to hold off objections from Trump, Republican
senators have argued that the policies under discussion would not have an
immediate effect on problems at the border and would even give Trump greater
border enforcement authority if he is reelected. Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) said: “The
issue will still be a live issue and I’d think it’d be one of the defining
issues in the campaign. So we need to do our job here.” A GOP vocal
contingent raised objections, including during a heated exchanges during a
closed-door Republican lunch.
They argued that
presidents already have enough authority to implement hardline border measures
and Trump should have his say as Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) noted saying: “If we expect him to be able to secure the
border, he ought to be able to see this bill, and he ought to be able to be
engaged and say, is this going to help me secure the border or not. What we
know is, he doesn’t need it.”
Sen. J.D. Vance
(R-OH) who
has evolved into a staunch Trump ally and Ukraine
critic, said he spoke with Trump about the deal last week and he expressed
worry that it would be “too weak”
adding: “When it fails, as it will, it allows the president to blame quote,
unquote ‘MAGA Republicans’ for the failure of a border security package when in
reality what failed was very weak border security package that didn’t actually
do anything.”
But some Republicans worried walking away from an
opportunity to enact border policy could backfire.
For example, Sen. Mike
Rounds (R-SD) said: “If we were given
an opportunity, and we decided for political purposes, not to do it, yeah, I
think we could be in serious trouble. A lot of our candidates could be in
serious trouble back home.”
Sen. Lindsey Graham
(R-SC) and staunch Trump confidant, said: “The contours of the bipartisan
package, even if sealed under Biden, would equally create border-security tools
for a second Trump administration.”
My 2 Cents: Typical GOP blame game or just silly game: “Break
things in government and then run on a platform that only we can fix it.” This
is a classic example of a good bi-partisan deal that helps Ukraine and hinders
Putin, or if the deal fails, it fails the people of Ukraine while favoring
Putin – how sick is that prospect?
We shall see – hopefully both
parts pass – it certainly should so, stay tuned.
Thanks for stopping by.
No comments:
Post a Comment