Right Now in Trump
Administration – Easy to Lose Count
(so it seems almost daily)
The latest news with this headlines has rattled a lot of undocumented people:
“Trump’s
immigration crackdown and detention policy out for implementation.”
Okay, how
do we measure any incompetence? Let’s start with the new DHS policy implementation memos, which in essence say in part:
1. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE) agents will treat most unauthorized immigrants
currently in the U.S. as “priorities” for deportation.
2. The government will dramatically increase its capacity to detain immigrants, and should detain nearly all immigrants
caught near the U.S. (Southern) border.
3. That ICE shall work aggressively and will deputize local law enforcement to act as Federal agents
who can arrest unauthorized immigrants.
4. Make it easier
to deport children who come to the U.S. alone to reunite with their parents —
or parents they are reuniting with.
Basically
keeps, or so they say they will keep, the promises made under DACA (the
so-called “Dreamer” law) – but, we’ll have to wait and see how that plays out.
Allow the kids to stay, but boot out Mom and Dad … nice…!!! (Or like this sick example).
Most
of the policies laid out in the memos won’t change overnight. It’s now the job
of agencies, including ICE, Customs
and Border Protection (CBP), and
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS),
to do another round of interpretation and implementation based on these new memos.
(I Note: What
will be people’s initial ID be based on: (1) How they look, (2) their ethnicity,
(3) how they dress or hang out, or (4) their accent or speech?)
Highlights and What Could be Next?
1. “Papers, show me your papers.”
2. So, what is next: Tattoos on forearms with a control
number?
3. Then trains or buses to move them to a “detention
center” where they will be held or “concentrated” in one area until they are shipped
out of the U.S. and back to the country of their origin, and of course at tax payer’s
expense (unless Trump will get their native countries to reimburse us like
Mexico for the wall, um?).
Assume they have a job in the U.S. –
some for years or longer. What
happens to that job once they are yanked from it? What about their children. Say
they have 2 or 3 or more with some brought here as infants or even born here? That’s
a legal question for sure (i.e., the 14th Amendment – oops).
Maybe the employers will follow this Trump
example that I posted about earlier also as seen below and in
this link:
Trump
won approval in December 2016 to hire 77 foreign workers at his Mar-a-Lago
resort and Jupiter golf course through the H-2B visa program, according to a
review of data from the U. S. Department of Labor (DOL).
CNN
reported July 2016 that Trump companies employed at
least 1,256 foreign workers — most from Romania and South Africa over the past
15 years. His companies applied to hire 263 foreign workers even after Trump launched his presidential campaign
in which he railed against the loss of U.S. jobs to foreign workers. (How
ironic is that and what do we call that? Oh, yeah con-man hypocrisy).
I Note:
Some of those new Trump employees will receive less pay than they did the
year before from the newly minted deal maker-in-chief for example: Labor
records show that 25 cooks hired at Trump’s Palm Beach County properties
will earn $12.74 an hour, down from $13.01 an hour the year before. Some 15
house keepers and 37 wait staff, however, will see a modest raises.
They
will earn $10.17 an hour and $11.13 an hour, respectively, up from $10.07 an
hour and $10.99 an hour last year.
A
big concern for many who are asylum-seekers. They can be released from detention
if they can meet two tests:
(1) They have to prove to an
asylum officer that they have a “credible fear” of persecution.
(2)
They then must prove to an ICE agent that they are who they say they are and
aren’t a security risk.
Depending
on how those standards are set, and how ICE agents decide to implement them,
that could result in the detention of tens of thousands of children and families? Overall, immigrants in the detention centers
will now have a much harder time getting a fair hearing, let alone getting a lawyer, or even
having time to make their case. That means the government is more likely to
send a person who should have qualified for asylum back to her home country, thus
possibly putting them in mortal danger.
(I note: It is a violation of international law for any country
to return a person or persons to places they have escaped where they are or say
they are not safe or fear for their lives and safety).
We have not the first or last of this.
Stay tuned for sure.
No comments:
Post a Comment