Let’s Play “Collusion”
Five “W” – One “H”
(Easy Yet Complex by Careful
Design™)
Major
Update (April 14, 2017) – various sources and linked in this update:
The official investigation into relations between Trump and Russia now has “specific, concrete, and corroborative evidence of collusion” that has been reported. The evidence proves discussions took place “between people in the Trump campaign and agents of Russian influence relating to the use of hacked material (DNC and John Podesta),” a source told The Guardian.
The official investigation into relations between Trump and Russia now has “specific, concrete, and corroborative evidence of collusion” that has been reported. The evidence proves discussions took place “between people in the Trump campaign and agents of Russian influence relating to the use of hacked material (DNC and John Podesta),” a source told The Guardian.
The
developments come as it has emerged that Britain’s spy agencies were
among the first to alert their American counterparts to contact between members
of Mr. Trump’s campaign team and Russian intelligence operatives.
British and other European intelligence agencies first intercepted
suspicious “interactions” between people associated with the US President and
Russian officials in 2015 as part of routine surveillance of Russia,
intelligence sources have confirmed to a number of different publications. Spy agencies, including GCHQ, were not
deliberately targeting members of the Trump team but rather recorded
communications through “incidental collection,” CNN reports.
This
intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of
information under the “Five
Eyes” (US, UK, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada), which calls for sharing
certain types of Intel information among those five members.
Over
several months, different agencies targeting the same people began to see a
pattern in communications between the Trump campaign inner circle and
Russian operatives. For six months, until summer of 2016, interactions were
repeatedly flagged to intelligence
officials in the US who sources said were slow to act, with a source
telling the Guardian: “It looks like the U.S. agencies were asleep” [just as European agencies said there were contacts
going on between people close to Trump and people believed to be Russian
intelligence agents. You should be wary of this]. “The message was in
essence: Watch out. There’s something not right here.”
GCHQ's involvement in the investigation
is controversial. Trump's press secretary, Sean Spicer previously accused: “The British spying agency of bugging Trump Tower on
behalf of Barack Obama.” Spicer cited an unsubstantiated report on FOX News –
from which FOX later distanced itself. At that same time, GCHQ diverged
from its usual policy of refraining from commenting by describing the
Spicer allegation as “nonsense.”
Yes, utter nonsense the Brits say, but I wager that Sean Spicer will totally disagree, um? BTW: A new SNL slot awaits him — don't be late.
Spicer (R) McCarty (L) — I think ... damn
Stay tuned — a shit pot full of shoes yet to drop.
No comments:
Post a Comment