Dynamic
duo: Trump Jr. — Natalia Veselnitskaya
(Okay, Natasha — nobody will ever know)
This hot story today from
the Washington Post here in part:
BRIDGEWATER, NJ — President Trump on Sunday (August 5, 2018) offered
his most definitive and clear public acknowledgment that his oldest son (Donald
Jr.) met with a Kremlin-aligned lawyer at Trump Tower during the 2016 campaign
to “get information on an opponent,” by defending the meeting as “totally legal
and done all the time in politics.”
It is, however, against
the law for U.S. campaigns to receive donations or items of value from
foreigners, and that June 2016 meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and Natalia
Veselnitskaya is now a subject of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s
Russia probe.
While “collusion” is not
mentioned in U.S. criminal statutes, Mueller is investigating whether anyone
associated with Trump coordinated with the Russians, which could result in
criminal charges if they entered into a conspiracy to break the law, including
through cyber-hacking or interfering with the election.
A lot more on this follows in today’s post below:
Now put that aside
for a moment: Being offered and/or trying to get information from any
foreign government, let alone Russia an adversary is totally insane and illegal
(cite: anything of value from a foreign government related to a campaign) is
illegal says Jens David Ohlin, a law
professor at Cornell University, who is even blunter: “It’s a shocking
admission of a criminal conspiracy.”
Or from Ryan Goodman,
a former Defense Department special counsel who says: “The text of the
emails provide very clear evidence of participation in a scheme to involve the
Russian government in federal election interference, in a form that is
prohibited by federal criminal law.”
The official Federal
law citation: “The law states that no person shall knowingly solicit or
accept from a foreign national any contribution to a campaign of an item of
value.” Goodman concludes: “There is now a clear case that Donald J. Trump
Jr. meets all the elements of the law, which is a criminally enforced federal
statute.”
Note: The statute
in question here is: 52 USC 30121, 36 USC 510 —
that is the law governing foreign contributions to U.S. campaigns.
The solicitation bit is why it doesn’t matter if Trump Jr.
actually got useful information or not. The part that’s illegal is that that he
tried or wanted to acquire the dirt on Clinton from a foreign source, but not
successfully acquiring it.
However, it is still a crime to solicit this kind of information
from any foreign government under these conditions.
Some Trump loyalists will cling to the word “try to solicit”
saying “it was offered NOT solicited.”
But, Trump Jr. was clearly soliciting
information that he knew was coming from a foreign source. Given that political
campaigns regularly pay thousands of dollars to opposition researchers to dig
up dirt (that we all know happens), it seems like damaging information on
Clinton would constitute something “of value” to the Trump campaign.
My best example: Take
B&E (a serious crime – breaking and entering a home or other place to steal
money or jewels) but not finding to the robber dashes out only to be caught by
the cops while leaving the scene. Then the suspect pleads not guilty to robbery
saying to the cops “I got nothing,” but somehow the idiot forgets that B&E
is a crime… oops again, Jr.
My 2 cents: President Trump is 100% weak and wrong to even try and
justify this with a statement like: “It happens all the time.”
Note: True on one point only: Getting
dirt on an opponent in any campaign (called oppo) is common and not necessarily
illegal unless a crime were connected to obtaining/receiving the oppo
information (in any form); like stealing it, hacking from computers and
databases and taking it, or B&E (e.g., Watergate DNC HQ break in), or say
getting stolen info from WikiLeaks (Recall
that Trump said publicly: “I love WikiLeaks.”
You may not think it was
illegal, unlawful, or that it “happens all the time” – but the truth of the
matter is that you can bet the Russians knew exactly what they were doing,
legal or not. That was to cause or potentially cause as much election chaos and
turmoil as possible. That has been and always will be the Russian goal in such
matters.
It might, but getting
caught like this with Russian hands all over it – well, Mr. President, even a
Rick Perry oops moment won’t work.
Some Trump loyalists will
cling to the word “try to solicit” saying “it was offered NOT solicited.”
However, Trump Jr. was
clearly soliciting information that he thought was coming from the Russian
lawyer. Given that political campaigns regularly pay thousands of dollars to
opposition researchers to dig up dirt (that we all know happens), it seems like
damaging information on Clinton would constitute something “of value” to the
Trump campaign.
Thanks for stopping by.
No comments:
Post a Comment