No American
Media — Russian State Media only
(Trump: “I fired Comey” / Lavrov: “Wow, no kidding”)
The NY Times reported
that in the immediate aftermath of James Comey’s firing the FBI launched a
probe into “… whether Mr. Trump was knowingly working for Russia or had
unwittingly fallen under Moscow’s influence.”
It’s worth reviewing the precise chain of events here from TPM
written by Josh Marshall – worth
reading.
Also, this piggybacks on my post, same subject, seen
here – FYI.
1. Trump fired Comey May 9,
2017.
2. The following day, Trump
received Russia FM Sergei Lavrov and
Russian Amb. Sergei Kislyak in the
Oval Office at Vladimir Putin’s request.
3. The W/H indeed confirmed
that Trump had held the meeting because Putin had personally asked him to from a
phone call a few days earlier, in a W/H statement reported
on here from Politico and from The New Yorker reporter
Susan Glasser in part saying: “President
Trump chose to receive them because President Putin asked him to. Putin did
specifically ask on the call when they last talked.”
4. American media was barred from the event, but the
Russian state-run news agency, TASS (Russian: TACC)
was invited to cover the meeting, and the photos that were later released all came
out of Russia.
Significant:
At the meeting, Trump told
Lavrov and Kislyak that he had just fired Comey and that it had removed the
“pressure” he was under because of the FBI investigation into possible Trump
campaign collusion with Russia.
Trump told them: “I just fired the head of the FBI. He was crazy, a real nut job. I faced great pressure because of Russia. That’s taken off.”
Trump told them: “I just fired the head of the FBI. He was crazy, a real nut job. I faced great pressure because of Russia. That’s taken off.”
(Note:
That is according to an internal government summary document based on
notes taken during the meeting).
5. At the same meeting, Trump
also shared
highly classified intelligence about the ISIS with Lavrov, intelligence
that apparently came
from Israel and some say it jeopardized field sources and operations in
Syria.
The NY Times article
says that FBI agents felt ‘validated” in their decision to act so quickly and
decisively when these quotes from the President to Lavrov surfaced. This makes
it seem like this wasn’t itself part of the decision but vindicated the
decision after the fact. But that may be a bit misleading.
The summary of the
discussions was first revealed
to The New York Times nine days later on May 19th, presumably
after the FBI had already kicked off its investigation. It seems plausible that
the FBI would have had access to this information before the Times. But
if we take the Times’ reporting from last night on its face, they only
learned what the President said after they started the probe.
Even if that’s the case, the
fact of the meeting itself, held at President Putin’s request and with no
American press allowed would have raised alarm bells throughout the intelligence
and counter-intelligence worlds and almost certainly figured into the decision
to launch the investigation.
My 2 cents: All this reporting ties in the gaffe by Paul Manafort’s
lawyers who did a poor job of redacting information that I posted about here.
The walls are closing in on Trump and that’s why White House Counsel Pat Cipollone just hired 17 new
lawyers to help defend Trump (apparently at all costs)
against Mueller and his expected more pressure on Trump.
Stay tuned and thanks for stopping by.
No comments:
Post a Comment