Tuesday, November 29, 2022

A Lot of Trump Investigations: Mar-a-Lago Classified Documents the Most-Serious

His own words are admission of crime

His Truth Social post admits the crime

His Tweet of January 6 being wild is intent

Proof meets Pudding

My introduction: In court under oath a person on trial lies – that’s a crime – when a jury finds defendant guilty no matter how they pled, still guilty, and if they admit openly to a crime say in public or on radio. TV, on a telephone message, etc., then well: oops. That is enough to send them to jail even without a trial, per se – that is by their own admission of the stated crime with or without officially having been charged and/or tried and found guilty by a jury.

Related from the story below: “Self-incriminating: Legal experts warn Trump's admission at rally may be admissible evidence

The full story from Salon.com with this headline on those points:

“He has the right to remain silent” Legal experts say Trump’s Truth Social post may be evidence”

Trump appeared to admit to taking secret national security documents home to Mar-a-Lago in a lengthy Truth Social rant on Monday (November 28).

Trump spent much of the day lashing out at new special counsel Jack Smith, who was tapped by AG Merrick Garland to oversee the DOJ’s  investigations into classified documents seized from Mar-a-Lago and Trump's role in the January 6 Capitol insurrection.

Trump repeatedly falsely equated bringing the documents to his residence to the standard process the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) used to preserve presidential documents for past officeholders' presidential libraries.

Attempting to discredit Jack Smith as a hit man for Obama and a fully weaponized monster, Trump insisted he is innocent saying: Unless the six previous Presidents did something wrong also.”

Trump wrote in another post, seemingly admitting to taking documents home, unlike past presidents whose documents were overseen by NARA: When will you invade the other Presidents' homes in search of documents, which are voluminous, which they took with them, but not nearly so openly and transparently as I did?”

Trump repeatedly and falsely has claimed:Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, and George H. W. Bush all took millions of documents from the White House (when they left office).”

A CNN fact-check noted in October proves all of those Trump claims false.

NARA issued a rare statement rejecting those Trump attacks, stating in part that:The claims that indicate or imply that those Presidential records were in the possession of the former Presidents or their representatives, after they left office, or that the records were housed in substandard conditions, are false and misleading.”

Legal observers and others have cited the false claim as potential evidence in a possible prosecution.

Washington Post reporter Josh Dawsey tweeted: “Imagine Trump's lawyers may not love that final line of his latest Truth Social post.”

National security attorney Brad Moss said the post could be entered as an exhibit into evidence at a potential trial as he wrote:He has the right to remain silent.”

Note: The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution addresses criminal procedure and other aspects of the Constitution. It was ratified, along with nine other articles, in 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights.

Based on that Moss statement is the proverbial icing on the cake from renowned former federal prosecutor, Glenn Kirschner wrote this about Trump’s openly posted statement which said: I took them (the government documents that were not my property) . . . openly & transparently.”

Kirschner then wrote:I love when a (future) defendant unequivocally admits to the crime. Ladies & gentleman of the jury, we ask you to return the ONLY verdict consistent w/the evidence. Guilty.”

My 2 cents: All that and the basic confession from Trump reminds me of this from justice in the Wild, Wild West court paraphrased from a movie from Judge Roy Bean to jury:Bring the guilty bastard in, I’ll give him a fair trial, and then we’ll hang him.”

Trump’s admission about taking the Mar-a-Lago classified documents is revealing and stark – so will he skate or will the country get the justice we say we cherish that states: “No one is above the law.”

Wait and see but hang on tight, it might get a whole lot uglier than ever before with, against, and from Trump.

Thanks or stopping by


No comments: