Human Rights Watch (HRW) explains Cluster Bombs (formatted to fit the blog).
Ukraine wants the U.S. to provide them and we are.
What are cluster bombs?
A cluster bomb opens in midair
and releases smaller “bomblets” across a wide area (see image above). The
bomblets are designed to take out tanks and equipment, as well as troops,
hitting multiple targets at the same time.
The munitions are launched
by the same artillery weapons that the U.S and allies have already provided to
Ukraine for the war – such as howitzers – and the type of cluster munition that
the U.S is planning to send is based on a common 155mm shell that is already
widely in use across the battlefield.
Pro and Con (Note: More Cons as
noted below):
Pro: Cluster
munition is more effective than artillery shells because they inflict damage
over a wider area that can be is important for trying to clear heavily fortified
Russian positions in Ukraine for them go use.
1. Con: Cluster munitions have had a high dud rate. That means that thousands of unexploded bomblets remain behind enabling them to kill and maim people decades later.
The U.S last
used its cluster munitions in Iraq in 2003, then stopped using them as the
conflict shifted to more urban environments with denser civilian populations.
2. Con: HRW and the
UN accused Israel of firing as many as four million cluster munitions into
Lebanon against Hezbollah in 2006. That left
unexploded ordnance that threatens Lebanese civilians even to this day.
3. Con: The
Saudi-led coalition in Yemen was criticized for its use of cluster bombs in the
war with the Iran-backed Houthi that has ravaged the country. It was the second
deadliest country for cluster munitions after Syria. Children
were killed or maimed long after the bombs fell, making it difficult to know
the true toll even today.
4. Con: In the
1980’s, Russia made heavy use of cluster bombs during their 10-year invasion of
Afghanistan. As a result of decades of war, the Afghan
countryside still remains one of the most heavily mined countries in the world.
My 2 Cents: I mostly agree with and seldom disagree with the Biden decisions regarding use of our military vis-à-vis giving more aid to Ukraine in their war against Russia.
However, giving thousands of cluster bombs to them now
I believe is a “bridge too far.”
The pros and cons are explained above based on the results from unexploded (dud) bombs many years after they are dropped and that can still inflict death and destruction.
Also, my decision
is based on my two years of combat in VN and a couple of years after that
when I called and controlled Naval gunfire, artillery, and airstrikes as a
Marine A/O flying in OV-10’s.
I think it’s a bad move. We shall see, but that is my recommendation to President Biden – don’t provide them. Continue the way we are now, but no cluster bombs.
Thanks for stopping by.
No comments:
Post a Comment