Another
Typical GOP Trickle Down Tax Cut Law
(As
usual for the Very Top)
One Possible Another
good part
(Wait and see re: health care)
Good part for small select category
One good part (Time will tell for future application)
Two
words come to mind when assessing Trump (actually a lot of words come to mind,
but these two seen to be mainstream): Serial
Liar…
[I
have never in my life called any president a liar – many have told lies, yes;
but Trump lies 24/7 and always for his own benefit and glorification and
self-promotion].
Case
in the point and the subject for this post a CBS news analysis of the Trump-GOP
2017 tax cut:
Trump
made some bold promises last year when he signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the
TCJA) into
law on December 22, 2017. Among the boldest promises: That middle-class
workers would see a pay increase of $4,000 to $9,000 and that “the richest
Americans wouldn't gain at all.”
By
those measures, the tax reform package has fallen short, some experts say. Wage
growth remains modest, and most middle-class taxpayers have seen only a
middling financial boost from lower tax rates, which declined by about 1
percent to 4 percent.
William G. Gale, the co-director of the
Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, in
a recent article for the Brookings Institution wrote: “[… the biggest benefits went to the rich and increased the inequality of
income. The tax cuts are unlikely to boost long-term growth and could mire the
economy in debt…].”
Gale also wrote regarding the CBO’s projected
deficit $1.9 trillion over the next 10 years that: “It is unclear
how the TCJA will eventually be financed, but in the most likely scenarios, most
households will end up worse off than had the TCJA never passed. In
short, the TCJA likely made the current generation of high-income households
better off at the expense of lower-income households and future generations.”
(I note: This outcome is precisely how most DEMS predicted
would be the impact of that tax cut. Further, most DEMS still do not believe or
trust the GOP’s “Bible version of Trickle down: Give tax cuts to the top and they
will help everyone else.” That continues to be the myth and it likewise continues
to fail and quite frankly it has since the Reagan days).
So, to be more precise and as the tax law turns one-year old, here's a
look at the biggest winners and losers from the landmark measure.
Winners: Corporations
Corporations
are now taxed at a 21 percent rate instead of the previous 35 percent. That reduction
was framed as a way to allow companies to keep more profits, which they would (Trump
and the GOP professed) give increased working wages, thus leading to that
promised $4,000 to $9,000 pay increase. (You might want to insert a Rick
Perry “oops” here).
In
reality, Corporations are diverting much
of those proceeds to investors, not to workers. Only 6 percent of tax
cut-related savings have gone to workers, according to Just Capital, a nonprofit advocacy group. By contrast, about 56
percent of those savings have been funneled to investors in the form of
buybacks and dividends.
Through mid-December, U.S. companies spent a
record $1 trillion this year on buying back their own stock, which props up
their value.
Winners: The rich
The
rich are getting richer thanks to the tax bill; even faster than before.
The
top 20 percent of earners around the country have seen a nearly 3 percent gain
in after-tax income since the tax cut bill was passed (according to the Tax
Policy Center). That means a typical household in that group, which has annual
income of roughly $348,000, will enjoy a boost of about $10,000.
Meanwhile,
income for the lowest 20 percent of earners rose only 0.4 percent after the tax
bill – and that amounts to a benefit of a mere $56.00.
After-tax
income for middle-class Americans – those in the middle 60 percent increased
between 1.2 and 1.9 percent this year.
Winners: Some small
businesses and freelancers
Some small businesses and freelancers are benefiting from the tax law's more favorable
treatment of the so-called “pass-through entities, such as sole proprietorships
and partnerships.”
The
TCJA lets them deduct 20 percent of their earnings from taxable income. That
means a freelancer earning $100,000 will only pay taxes on $80,000 of income,
effectively allowing them to enjoy $20,000 in income tax-free. But, there
are some limitations.
Significant: Taxpayers who earn more than $157,500 for single
filers, or $315,000 for joint filers may not qualify for the pass-through deduction,
for example.
(I note: So, I guess Trump considers them “rich.” Thus reflecting back
on his aforementioned promise: “The richest
Americans wouldn't gain at all.” Again “serial liar” strikes home).
Losers: Taxpayers in
high-tax states
In some cases, taxpayers will end up owing more next April, especially
those who live in high-tax states. That's because the TCJA caps the state and
local tax (SALT) deduction at $10,000. For example, in New York State where
income and property taxes tend to be high, residents will pay an additional
$14.3 billion in taxes in 2018, said AG Barbara Underwood earlier this
year.
The IRS warned this week that some taxpayers who expected refunds may
actually end up owing due to the new tax law. That includes people who also live
in high-tax states.
Losers: Future taxpayers
Although
the tax cuts put more money in people's pockets, one day they will have to be
paid for, and that tab is going to be mammoth. The law right now as it stands projects
an increase in deficit by $1.9 trillion over the next 10 years (that according
to the CBO).
My 2 cents: This whole bill is a huge wait and see law.
Thanks for stopping by.
No comments:
Post a Comment