Lewandowski, Sessions, McGahn: Involved
in Trump
Plot to Get Rid of Mueller
Writing
for the New York Times, under the headline, “4
Disturbing Details You May Have Missed in the Mueller Report,” Lawfare.blog
managing editor Quinta Jurecic notes an interaction that Trump had with his former
campaign employee Corey Lewandowski; she writes:
“A month after Mr.
Mueller’s appointment, President Trump’s ordered his former campaign manager
Corey Lewandowski — who was not a government employee — to convey a message
to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, telling him to constrain the scope of the
Mueller investigation. Simply firing Mr.
Mueller would have been within the president’s power. Asking a private citizen
to deliver that message, however, moves this outside the realm of the
president’s management of the executive branch and toward clearer-cut
obstruction of justice.”
Further Note: Lewandowski never delivered the
message, but Trump still quite possibly committed a crime of a different order
than had previously been discussed.
Here’s why: “AG Bill Barr’s view of view is
that the president did not obstruct justice is informed by his argument that
presidential conduct authorized by the Constitution cannot constitute
obstruction, but this does not address
conduct, like the order to Lewandowski, that took place outside the scope
of the Constitution” (e.g., Lewandowski is not under the purview of nor
employee of or far Trump and thus he is not even close to being covered by any presidential
executive privilege excuse between Trump and an official employee or staff
official for that legal benefit loophole).
Specifically
from Mueller (from the New Yorker): In assessing Trump’s behavior, the report uses some satisfyingly
plain English, such as this paragraph on
page 156 of the second volume, which relates to obstruction:
“Our investigation
found multiple acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue
influence over law enforcement investigations, including the
Russian-interference and obstruction investigations. The incidents were
often carried out through one-on-one meetings in which the President sought to use
his official power outside of usual channels. These actions ranged from efforts to remove the Special Counsel and to
reverse the effect of the Attorney General’s recusal; to the attempted use of
official power to limit the scope of the investigation; to direct and indirect
contacts with witnesses with the potential to influence their testimony.
Viewing the acts collectively can help to illuminate their significance. For
example, the President’s direction to McGahn to have the Special Counsel
removed was followed almost immediately by his direction to Lewandowski to
tell the Attorney General to limit the scope of the Russia investigation to
prospective election-interference only — a
temporal connection that suggests that both acts were taken with a related purpose
with respect to the investigation.”
My 2 cents: This needs close scrutiny as Trump
continues to hide his crimes. This may be the proverbial icing on his
impeachment cake. At the time cited above, Cory Lewandowski had no official status; and, now Trump has no right to claim executive conversation protection with his “executive privilege”
authority.
Related
story from here about a lousy love triangle between:
Rob Porter, fired for abusing two wives; Hope Hicks in the middle, also dismissed;
and Corey Lewandowski (his story is above).
(She overhead
Trump’s plot to end Mueller)
So, stay tuned.
We shall see. Thanks for stopping by.
No comments:
Post a Comment