From the Insider this timely topic: Guns for self-defense, protect your
property is all well and good and so is the so-called “Stand Your Ground” law
now in some 30 states, but that law lately has been taken to the extreme with examples
below that seem to mean: “Shoot first and then ask why.”
According to The NY Times the “Stand Your Ground” laws — operate on the principle that a
person has the right to use deadly force to defend themselves against a threat.
But those laws largely remove the obligation of the gun owner to retreat if
possible which is not happening in key recent cases.
Experts speak on this
topic:
1. Dave Workman, a
gun rights advocate and spokesperson for the Second Amendment Foundation, told
Insider: “In the U.S, guns are discussed primarily as a tool for
self-defense against criminals, intruders, or threats. Most people are buying
guns nowadays for personal protection. The reason they're doing that is for
self-defense and defense of their families.”
2. Christian Heyne,
the VP of Policy and Programs at the Brady Campaign, a gun control advocacy
nonprofit, told Insider: “Some gun violence experts and gun control
advocates said the way guns are marketed is in part responsible for fueling an
ideology of self-preservation mixed with fear. If [gun owners] are being told
repeatedly by the gun industry that the reason why they need their firearm is
to be ready to shoot at any given moment, then that's the mentality that they
have in having the firearm. Certainly we're seeing a horrifying trend with how
certain states are describing and discussing self-defense. What is terrifying
is the fact that now we have corrupted and upended that idea of self-defense in
certain states with these 'shoot-first' laws, where now people are emboldened
and empowered to shoot first and ask questions later.”
Recent Shooting
Examples: These three cases highlight simply being at the wrong place at the
wrong time.
1. On April 13, an elderly homeowner in Kansas City, MO shot
16-yeaer old Ralph Yarl in the head after Yarl rang the wrong home doorbell. He survived and is
recovering now.
2. Then just days later, 20-year-old Kaylin Gillis was shot
by a homeowner after the car she was riding in pulled into the wrong driveway in
a rural part of New York. Ms. Gillis died at the ER
3. Now, more recently, two cheerleaders were shot after one of them
mistakenly climbed into the wrong car in a Texas parking lot. One survived and
one still has serious injuries.
The senseless shootings of Kaylin Gillis and Ralph Yarl have sparked new scrutiny of these “Stand Your Ground” laws.
But in both cases, Ralph Yarl and Kaylin Gillis, law
enforcement determined the homeowners' actions went beyond what is protected by
self-defense laws and both have been charged in the shootings.
The Texas man who shot the cheerleaders is in police custody
pending charges.
It's not yet clear what defense the accused shooters will
argue in court. Still, advocates and experts said it's time to re-examine the
laws and the larger culture around self-defense.
People aren't very
good at accurately evaluating real threats – as more experts weigh in:
3. Jonathan Metzl, a
sociology professor at Vanderbilt University who studies gun control, told
Insider: “This is the natural outcome of 'stand your ground' laws. When we
tell people that anytime they perceive a threat, they can fire their guns and
that they have social and legal protection to do so, you see that people
misinterpret everyday situations as threats. And then they kill people.”
4. Jack McDevitt, a
professor of criminology and criminal justice at Northeastern University, says
that from the point of view of a criminologist, “these laws are not effective,”
and he told insider: “They empower people to say, this is your property.
You can protect it in any way you want. And that should never be the case. Obviously
people should have the right to defend themselves, but they have to be able to
assess the level of threat. And it's not just having somebody pull into the driveway
to turn around or having somebody come up on their porch because they're at the
wrong house. They feel like they're empowered to act violently in a situation
that may not call for that.”
The Giffords Law Center cites research from the JAMA
Internal Medicine journal that found that the rate of firearm homicide
increased 32% and the overall homicide rate increased 24% after “Stand Your
ground” laws were first enacted in Florida.
5. Dave Workman, gun rights advocate and spokesperson for the Second Amendment Foundation, added: “The oldest human right is the right of self-preservation. And that hasn't changed. You have the absolute right to defend your own life or the life of a loved one against threat of serious bodily injury or death.”
Workman also disagreed
that U.S gun culture is encouraging fear of outside threats; he believes it's
more of a “culture of preparedness.”
Workman pointed to incidents of gun owners stopping
violence, including a man who shot and killed a gunman after he opened
fire in an Indiana mall last year, saying: “Any place that you might
happen to be where an incident unfolds that places you in jeopardy, or the
people with you in jeopardy, that I think raises the alarm that maybe I should
be prepared for the worst possible scenario.”
Summary: “Our
gun culture and laws need change because violence is uniquely dangerous, which predictably
shows up in new situations like those examples seen above and in other epidemic
forms.”
My 2 Cents: This fine review basically speaks for itself – and there’s
not much else I can say except I agree with summary.
Sad to say, things have
gotten worse and they are not apt to change anytime soon. Gun violence will get
worse before any positive changes lessen it and that is primarily due to gun
lovers, massive amount of guns, and the strong support between the NRA and
those in elected office.
Thanks for stopping by.
No comments:
Post a Comment